Checking that the rectification actually happened

In short: Why the second visit is the one that closes items rather than moving them.

The problem with a closed list

Items get ticked in a spreadsheet. Whether the work was done, and done properly, is a separate question.

Revisits each earlier item and marks it rectified, partly rectified or outstanding, with a photograph either way.

Frame items get reassessed at lock-up as a matter of course. Handover items get a dedicated visit before settlement.

Work reported complete that was part done, and finishing applied over an item without the item being addressed.

Where the first list ran long, the second visit generally pays for itself in items that would otherwise have quietly closed.

Written by our local inspection team from work carried out in Austral. Licensed building practitioners.

More defect reports guides for Austral

14 April 2026 · 7 min read

Is a reinspection cheaper?

It is, since the scope has already been set. The fee covers confirming rather than finding.

What if items are still open?

They remain logged as open items, dated. That written history is what gives you standing.

When should it happen?

Once the builder says the list is closed. Going earlier produces a report full of work in progress.

Can the builder dispute it?

They can, and each item cites what it fails against, so the discussion stays on the document.